|
It is actually very readable and has lots of good clear information. I am using this book for a class.
I wish I would have read as an interior design student, but I wouldn't have appreciated it as a 21 year-old. The book is very informative,easy to read, and enjoyable.
It's twice as thick and scary at first site. This is very good. Got a nice CD in the back to use for forms, nice. If using it to study for the NCIDQ, better start reading way in advance, it's long and small print. I haven't read the whole thing though. This version is so much better than the old one.
Is this 1960. HELLO. And some things seem outdated. They should instead inform the contractor and the client of such inconsistencies and NOT recommend a remedy.
Its a good book, but there are some things I think need to be reworked.There are real-world examples that are kinda hokey.There are lots of ethical "what would you do" examples with no follow up about whether or not such an example is an ethics violation or not. Forcing women to wear skirts violates employment law and the author should know this. In the chapter on preparing marketing presentations, the author states that women "MAY" be permitted to wear trousers to a presentation depending on the firm they work for. With relating the examples to codes of ethics, these examples are pointless.There seem to be some factual errors too.
It is up to the contractor to decide the appropriate remedy and the client to determine the appropriate contract action to take. Overall its a useful book, but I wouldn't call it great. For example, the author states that if a designer witnesses work on a job site that is not in conformance with drawings they should intervene and stop work. Contract law clearly states a designer should NEVER intervene.
good information for starting a design business (not just interior) or to rewrite an existing plan that needs some freshening up.
|